检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李沛[1]
出 处:《钦州学院学报》2017年第6期17-20,共4页Journal of Qinzhou University
摘 要:新旧五代史对冯道的评价不同,薛史褒扬之意明显,欧史则多负面评价,尤其对冯道仕历多朝有所不满。通过阅读宋代史料发现,历史上对冯道的评价并不完全与欧阳修一样持批判态度,并且结合冯道所处的五代乱世,可以看到他仕历多朝具有一定合理性和必然性。欧阳修对冯道的贬抑态度与春秋笔法有关,也与欧阳修的经学思想以及时代政治的大背景有关。The evaluations on Feng Dao in the New History of the Five Dynasties and the Old History of the Five Dynasties are different. The latter is mainly positive, while the former negative, especially on his serving several dynasties. Through reading rele- vant historical materials ,we find that the historical evaluation on Feng Dao did not entirely match Ou Yangxiu'criticism. Because the politics of the Five Dynasties was turbulent,it's reasonable and inevitable for him to serve several dynasties. Ou Yangxiu's atti- tude was related to his thought and politics at that time.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3