碳交易机制下以技术投入为导向的边际减排成本曲线研究——以水泥、火电、煤炭和钢铁行业为例  

Marginal Abatement Cost Curve of Technology Oriented Under Carbon-Trading Mechanism——Taking Cement,Thermal Power,Coal and Iron and Steel Sectors as an Example

作　　者：刘楠峰[1] 范莉莉[1] 陈肖琳[2] 

机构地区：[1]西南交通大学经济管理学院,四川成都610031 [2]四川理工学院法学院,四川自贡643000

出　　处：《中国科技论坛》2017年第7期57-63,86,共8页Forum on Science and Technology in China

基　　金：国家自然科学基金项目(71271177);四川省社会科学重点研究基地系统科学与企业发展研究中心规划项目(Xq16B02);成都市科技项目(2015-RK00-00168-ZF)

摘　　要：本文构建了不同配额分配机制下考虑碳配额成本的边际减排成本曲线(MACC)模型,并通过查阅大量节能减排技术的技术细节和应用实例,对祖父法分配机制下水泥、火电、煤炭和钢铁行业以技术投入为导向的一般企业的MACC模型进行实证研究。分析发现,这四类行业企业的有效成本和零成本技术均能贡献较大的减排潜力;在祖父制碳排放权分配机制下,以这四类行业企业为主体的交易市场中的交易价格可能会长期在较低的水平运行。在此基础上,分别从具体企业与一般企业之间、具体企业之间两个层面分析了行业内边际减排成本曲线差异的形成机理。This paper constructed the marginal cost curve （MACC） model considering carbon quota cost under different quota alloca- tion mechanism. Through consulting a large number of technical details and application examples of the energy conservation and emis- sions reduction technology, it did the empirical research for the MACC models of technology oriented of cement, thermal power, coal and iron and steel sectors under the grandfather allocation mechanism. Analysis found that the four types of industry enterprise＇s effective cost technology could zero cost technology could contribute a larger reduction potential; under the grandfather allocation mechanism, the trading price in the market composed of four types of industry enterprise might be long in the lower level. On this basis, this paper analyzed the formation mechanism of the difference between the marginal cost curve in the same sector respectively from the two aspectsbetween the specific enterprises and general enterprises, between the specific enterprises and specific enterprises.

关 键 词：低碳经济 MACC模型 碳交易 碳无形资产 

分 类 号：F124.5[经济管理—世界经济] F426