市场化水平的门槛效应与差异化的产业政策  

Threshold Effect of Marketization and Differentiated Industrial Policy

作　　者：孙早[1] 席建成[1] SUN Zao XI Jiancheng(Xi＇an Jiaotong University, Xi＇an 710061)

机构地区：[1]西安交通大学经济与金融学院

出　　处：《经济与管理研究》2016年第8期23-31,共9页Research on Economics and Management

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目"以企业为主体的战略性新兴产业自主创新机制研究"(11BJY006);国家社会科学基金青年项目"新常态下产业结构转型升级的路径选择研究"(15CJL028);教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划"公司成长与现代产业的演进"(NCET-11-0429);国家自然科学基金青年项目"有偏技术进步下产能利用不足发生机制研究"(71503198)

摘　　要：本文运用中国工业的相关数据检验政府补贴、税收优惠两种形式的产业政策效果与一国(地区)市场化水平之间的关系。研究发现:(1)产业政策的正向作用与市场化水平密切相关,客观上存在着市场化水平的门槛效应,即当市场化水平达到某一拐点(门槛)值时,产业政策的正向作用将会显著增强;(2)不同形式的产业政策对市场化水平的要求不同,当市场化水平门槛值介于5.37至6.93时,政府补贴的效果要好于税收优惠。新时期产业政策的设计和实施需要充分考虑经济体的市场发育水平,应具有普惠性质;针对不同地区市场化水平的差异,应推行差异化的产业政策。This paper investigated the relationship among government subsidies,tax incentives and the marketization level of a country（region） by using the relevant data of China＇s industry sector.It is found that：（1）The positive role of industrial policy is closely related to the level of marketization.Theoretically,there is a threshold effect which depends on the marketization level of the country.When the level of the marketization index reaches a certain inflection point（threshold value）,the positive role of industrial policy will be significantly enhanced;（2） Different forms of industrial policy correspond to different levels of market threshold value.When the marketization level of the threshold value is between 5.37 and 6.93,the effect of government subsidies is better than that of tax incentives.Thus,the design and implementation of industrial policy in the new period should take full account of the marketization level of the country,and the industrial policy should be inclusive,and different regions with different marketization levels should make differentiated industrial policy

关 键 词：产业政策 政府补贴 税收优惠 市场化水平 

分 类 号：F062.9[经济管理—政治经济学]