论“N+Adj→Adj+(N)”组合构式中内含与凸显  

On the Innerness of the Compositional Construction of “N + Adj→Adj +(N)” and Its Profiling

作　　者：毛继光[1] 刘铭爽 

机构地区：[1]温州大学外国语学院,浙江温州325035

出　　处：《山东外语教学》2017年第3期13-22,共10页Shandong Foreign Language Teaching

基　　金：国家社科基金一般项目"英汉结果句式认知语法之对比研究"(项目编号:14BYY008);浙江省教育厅高等教育教学改革项目:概念驱动-认知友好型的"高级英语"课堂教学改革(项目编号:kg 2015368)的部分成果

摘　　要：组合性是复合词语意义生成的一种重要方式。在认知语言学研究的视阈里,英语复合词"N+Adj→Adj+(N)"构式中的不同语义成分合成有据、凸显有序、表征有异。全文以兰盖克(1987)建立的组合模型框架为基点,分析模型内不同成分凸显强弱,并作为认知解读的参照点,再结合考虑目标组合词语环境,我们发现该类组合词语经内在互动,激活整合出多种新的认知意义,与完全组合义差异明显。同时我们依据对英语为母语的美国大学生问卷调查结果,将此类合成词的组合性内部凸显现象分成三大类别:名词凸显,形容词凸显,整体凸显。Compositionality is one of the key ways of forming words and generating lexical meanings. From the perspective of cognitive linguistics components in the English compositional constructions, like ＂N＋Adj→Adj＋（N） ＂, help to produce different construals in terms of inner validation, sequentiality and motivational representation. Based on the constructional model proposed by Langacker in 1987, we find that different compositions bdng about different profiles due to their respective reference points, and that they are conjugated with the target （ ± N） to dynamically construct cognitive interpretations, since their lexical meanings are cognitively distinguished from those formations which are strictly based on their full compositionality, To fortify our research significance we conducted a questionnaire on its soundness across the United States, taking college students as research subjects, and we found that the compositionality of those compound adjective could be divided into three sub-types： noun profiling, adjective profiling, and composite profiling,

关 键 词：名+形复合词 组合性 构式语法 凸显关系 

分 类 号：H314[语言文字—英语]