两种湿敷方法对PICC穿刺点局部感染的疗效观察  

Observation of efficacy of two hydropathic compress methods on local infection of PICC puncture site

作　　者：莫春玲[1] 屈盈莹[1] 罗淑娟[1] 黎艳[1] 

机构地区：[1]中山大学孙逸仙纪念医院静脉导管护理门诊,广州市510120

出　　处：《护理实践与研究》2017年第11期112-113,共2页Nursing Practice and Research

摘　　要：目的:观察甲硝唑注射液及安尔碘皮肤消毒剂两种湿敷方法对PICC穿刺点局部感染的疗效。方法:将2014年10月~2015年7月发生的穿刺点感染40例患者设为对照组,应用安尔碘皮肤消毒剂湿敷治疗;2015年8月~2016年7月发生的穿刺点感染46例患者设为试验组,应用甲硝唑注射液湿敷治疗。观察两组患者的治疗效果及治愈时间。结果:试验组治疗效果优于对照组,治疗效果比较无统计学意义(P>0.05);试验组治愈时间(3.83±1.29)d,短于对照组(5.46±1.75)d,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:甲硝唑注射液湿敷治疗PICC穿刺点局部感染能有效地控制感染,且明显缩短治疗时间,减少了患者的经济负担和心理负担。Objective：To observe the efficacy of two hydropathic compress methods, metronidazole injection and amaranth skin disinfectant, on local infection of PICC puncture site.Methods：A total of 40 patients with puncture point infection from October 2014 to July 2015 were selected as the control group, and they were treated with hydropathic compress method by applying Anerdian skin disinfectant.A total of 46 patients with puncture point infection from August 2015 to July 2016 were selected as experimental group and they were treated with hydropathic compress method by applying metronidazole injection.The therapeutic effect and cure time of the two groups were observed.Results：The treatment efficacy of the experimental group was superior to that of the control group.The treatment effect was not statistically significant （P〉0.05）.The cure time of experimental group （3.83±1.29 days） is shorter than that of the control group （5.46±1.75 days）.The difference was statistically significant （P〈0.05）.Conclusion：Metronidazole injection hydropathic compress treatment of local infection of PICC puncture site can effectively control the infection and significantly shorten the treatment time.It can reduce the economic burden and psychological burden of patients.

关 键 词：经外周静脉置入中心静脉导管 感染 甲硝唑 湿敷 

分 类 号：R472[医药卫生—护理学]