检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:许海云[1] 苏逸飞[1] Xu Haiyun SuYifei(School of History, Renmin University of China, Beijing, 100572)
出 处:《军事历史研究》2017年第3期103-113,共11页Military History Research
基 金:2012年中国人民大学明德青年学者项目"北约政治与安全战略研究"(12XNJ010)
摘 要:"前沿防御战略"在冷战时期推动了北约防御安全实践。该战略兼具战略和战术双重含义,在安全职能上强调防御和威慑双重目标,在作战手段上主张核力量和常规武装力量共同施用,在防御地域上突出在欧洲不同地区实行梯次防御。冷战结束后,北约以战略新概念代替"前沿防御战略"。但在乌克兰危机爆发后,北约似乎又走上了前沿防御和对抗的老路,以此抗衡俄罗斯,但此举是否可以真正发挥作用,还需在欧洲战略博弈中进一步观察。The "Frontline Defense Strategy" promoted the practice of NATO' s defense security during the Cold War. It combined strategic and tactical meanings in theory, emphasized both defensive and deterrent goals in security functions, advovated dual application of nuclear and conventional measures in means of combat, and stressed echelon defense in different areas of Europe. With the end of the Cold War, NATO' s new Strategic Concept replaced its "Frontline Defense Strategy". But after the outbreak of the Ukrainian crisis, NATO seemed to have returned to the old way of frontline defense and confrontation in order to counter Russia. Whether or not the new concept will work in the European strategic games, we need to wait and see .
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.147