检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张雍锭
机构地区:[1]北京师范大学刑事法律科学研究院,北京100875
出 处:《山东警察学院学报》2017年第3期32-38,共7页Journal of Shandong Police College
摘 要:犯罪化在更大程度上是刑事政策学的概念,但因犯罪化涉及犯罪圈的大小及调整,也是刑法学备受关注的问题。不断发布的指导性案例,虽仅具事实上的约束力而暂时无法律效力,但会影响同类案件的判决结果,事实上扩展了犯罪化的外延。我国的犯罪化应当包括立法上的犯罪化,立法解释、司法解释上的犯罪化及指导性案例中的犯罪化,以往论著中所谓的"适用上的犯罪化"并不存在。犯罪化与入罪是两个不同的概念,二者之间虽有联系,但体现更多的则是区别。Criminalization is the concept of criminal policy science to a larger extent,but it is also a hot topic in the field of criminal law science because it involves the size and adjustment of criminal circle. As for the constantly-released guiding cases,though they only have the constraining force without a legal effect,they can still affect the results of verdict in similar cases. In fact,the extension of criminalization has been extended. China 's criminalization should include the criminalization of legislation,the criminalization of legislative interpretation and judicial interpretation,and that of guiding cases. There is no so-called'criminalization of application'in the previous works. In the terms of two different concepts of criminalization and crime,although there is a relationship between them,there are more differences.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28