检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈刚[1] 赵和照[1] 陈秀锋[1] 谭镇宗 何苗[1]
机构地区:[1]重庆市肿瘤研究所/医院/癌症中心胃肠外科,重庆400030
出 处:《中国现代普通外科进展》2017年第5期350-354,共5页Chinese Journal of Current Advances in General Surgery
摘 要:目的:综合分析腹腔镜胃癌根治术与开腹胃癌根治术,探讨腹腔镜胃癌根治术的可行性和安全性。方法:计算机检索The Cochrane library、pubmed、EMbase、CBM、维普、中国知网、万方数据库,检索时间为2010年1月至2015年8月,纳入腹腔镜胃癌根治术与开腹胃癌根治术的资料,用revman5.2处理数据,评价腹腔镜胃癌根治术的可行性及安全性。结果:共纳入公开发表的7篇临床对比研究,以腹腔镜胃癌根治术为观察组,开腹胃癌根治术为对照组进行Meta分析,观察组切口长度低于对照组(MD=-12.93,95%CI:-13.16^-12.70,P<0.00001);观察组出血量更少(MD=-129.98,95%CI:-220.54^-39.42,P=0.005);观察组与对照组淋巴结清扫数目无统计学差异(MD=0.77,95%CI:-2.06~3.60,P=0.56);腹腔镜组较开腹手术时间长(MD=49.17,95%CI:25.32~73.02,P<0.0001);观察组住院时间较对照组短(MD=-2.27,95%CI:-3.77^-0.77,P=0.003)。结论:腹腔镜胃癌根治术治疗胃癌是可行的,在手术彻底性、微创及安全性方面优于开腹胃癌根治术。Objective: To explore the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer through analysising the laparoscopic radical gastrectomy and open radical gastrec- tomy. Methods: Retrieval the Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE, CBM, VIP, CNKI, WANFANG DATA, the time is from January 2010 to August 2015. Bring into the comparative studies about la-parosopic radical gastrectomy and laparotomye.Processing data using the revman 5.2 to reaserch the feasibility and safety of laparoscopic radical gastrectomy. Results: 7 clinical comparative stud- ies were included in this study. The observation group was the group of laparoscopic radical gas- trectomy and the control group was the group of laparotomye. Results showed that the length of in- cision of the observation group was shorterfM D=- 12.93, 95% CI (- 13.16, - 12.70), P〈0.00001]; The observation group bleeding was lesser[MD=-129.98, 95%C1(-220.54, -39.42), P=0.005]; The num- ber of lymph node of the two groups had no significant difference [MD=0.77, 95% Cl (-2.56, 3.60), P=0.56];The operation time of the observation group was longer [MD=49.17, 95% CI (25.32, 73.02), P〈0.0001]; The hospitalization time of the observation group is shorter [MD=-2.27, 95% C1(-3.77, 0.77), P=0.003]. Conclusion: Laparoscopic radical gastrectomy is feasible and it is superior to la- parotomye within the thoroughness, minimally invasiving and safety.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.221.100.57