检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]江苏省南通市海安县人民医院骨科,江苏南通226600
出 处:《中国继续医学教育》2017年第13期107-109,共3页China Continuing Medical Education
摘 要:目的观察和分析骨科创伤感染封闭式负压吸引技术(VSD)治疗的临床效果。方法选择2014年5月—2016年4月在我院接受治疗的骨科创伤感染患者60例作为研究对象,将其随机分成观察组和对照组,每组各30例。对照组行常规换药治疗,观察组行VSD治疗。对两组的治疗效果、治愈时间进行对比研究。结果观察组治疗有效率为100.00%,对照组为80.00%,观察组治疗有效率高于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。观察组平均治愈时间为(17.00±9.68)d,对照组为(22.24±15.43)d,观察组治愈所花费时间更短,两组比较,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论在骨科创伤感染的治疗中应用VSD治疗,可提高治疗效果,加快患者的治愈进程。Objective To observe and analyze the clinical effect of VSD(closed negative pressure suction) in the treatment of traumatic infection in Department of orthopedics. Methods From May 2014 to April 2016, 60 patients with traumatic infection in Department of orthopedics were randomly divided into the observation group and the control group, 30 cases in each group. The control group was treated with routine dressing change, and the observation group was treated with VSD. The treatment effect and cure time of two groups were compared. Results The effective rate was 100.00% in the observation group and 80.00% in the control group. The effective rate of the observation group was higher, and the difference was statistically significant(P 〈0.05). The average cure time of the observation group was(17.00±9.68) d, the control group was(22.24±15.43) d, the observation group cured time was shorter, the difference was statistically significant(P 〈0.05). Conclusion The application of VSD in the treatment of traumatic infection in Department of orthopedics can improve the treatment effect and speed up the process of the treatment of patients.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.225