检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:包云[1] 申彤蕾[1] 蒋有娟[1] 董根妹[1] 袁粉定[1]
出 处:《中国抗生素杂志》2002年第6期351-353,共3页Chinese Journal of Antibiotics
摘 要:目的 :评价头孢吡肟治疗老年细菌性下呼吸道感染的临床疗效和安全性。方法 :将 68例老年细菌性下呼吸道感染患者随机分为试验组和对照组 ,分别给头孢吡肟静滴 1g ,每日二次或头孢噻肟静滴 2g ,每日二次 ,疗程均为 7~ 10d。结果 :两组痊愈率分别为 5 8.8%和 2 6.5 %,总有效率分别为 91.2 %和 67.6%;治疗后细菌清除率分别为 89.7%和 63 .3 %;以上结果均有显著性差异。不良反应发生率分别为 5 .9%和 8.8%,两组比较无显著性差异。结论 :头孢吡肟抗菌谱广 ,疗效好 ,不良反应轻微 ,对治疗老年细菌性下呼吸道感染是一个安全。Object: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of cefepime in aged patients with bacterial lower respiratory infections. Methed: Sixty eight aged patients and control group. Patients of test group were treated with cefepime and control group with bacterial lower respiratory infections were randomly divided into test group with cefotaxime. Resuts: The overall effective rates of cefepime and cefotaxime treatment groups were 91.2%(30/34) and 67.6%(23/34); and bacterial clearance rates were 89.1%(26/29) and 63.3%(19/30) respectively. There was a statistcal significance between the two groups ( P <0.05). Adverse drug event rates of two groups were 5.9%(2/34) and 8.8%(3/34) respectively, no significant difference was noted between cefepime and cefotaxime groups. Conclusion: Cefepime has a good therapeutic efficacy and safety in the treatment of aged patients with bacterial lower respiratory infections.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117