小议《灵枢·经脉》篇“是动”“所生病”及其区分依据  

Brief discussion on “shidong” diseases and “suosheng” diseases in Miraculous Pivot and reference to differentiate them

作　　者：曹昺焱[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国中医科学院西苑医院,北京100091

出　　处：《中国针灸》2017年第7期776-778,共3页Chinese Acupuncture & Moxibustion

摘　　要：《灵枢·经脉》中记载的十二经病候分"是动"和"所生病"两部分。后世医家对两者的区分依据有诸多解释,但该问题目前尚不能形成公论。笔者对前医观点进行综述,并在此基础上对各家观点进行评述,对"是动""所生病"的区分依据提出自己的见解。笔者认为,《灵枢·经脉》中"是动""所生病"的区分仅仅是出于体例上的原因,而与医理基本无涉;两部分内容在诊断和治疗中的作用是相似的。According to Miraculous Pivot ： meridian, the indications of twelve meridians were divided into two parts, the ＂shidong＂ diseases and ＂suosheng＂ diseases. Traditional Chinese medicine practitioners of later generation provided several assumptions to differentiate them, but a general conclusion was still not drawn. In this paper, the opinions of previous researches were summarized; based on this, the viewpoints of each opinion were reviewed, and the authors＇ opinion on method to differentiate ＂shidong＂ diseases and ＂suosheng＂ disease was proposed. It was concluded the differences of ＂shidong＂ diseases and ＂suosheng＂ disease in Miraculous Pivot was only based on style of the composing, not involving medical principles. The role of two parts on diagnosis and treatment was similar.

关 键 词：《灵枢·经脉》 是动病 所生病 

分 类 号：R245[医药卫生—针灸推拿学]