检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘冲[1] LIU Chong(Criminal Investigation Police University of China, Liaoning Shenyang 110854, China)
出 处:《中国人民公安大学学报(社会科学版)》2017年第3期82-88,共7页Journal of People’s Public Security University of China:Social Sciences Edition
摘 要:在刑事诉讼过程中,对于检、法机关适用疑罪从无原则并无争议。侦查机关是否适用疑罪从无以及如何适用则未形成共识。侦查阶段存在疑罪是一种客观存在,在现有法律框架内无法处理疑罪问题。在侦查阶段确立疑罪从无原则有其合理性。为解决疑罪的适用问题,应该在保持现有的撤案条件不变的基础上,修改相关法律规定,拓展终止侦查的适用条件,赋予侦查机关疑罪终止侦查的建议权,决定权在检察院,加强公安、检察机关在疑罪案件终止侦查中的相互制约,规定疑罪案件终止侦查的适用期限。In criminal proceedings, there is no doubt for the prosecution organs and the courts apply- ing the principle of in dubio pro reo. In contrast, there is no agreement as for whether, and how, criminal investigation agencies should adhere to this principle. Doubtful cases do exist in the criminal investigation stages, but within the present legal frame there is no way to deal with such doubtful cases. It is reasonable to establish the principle of in dubio pro reo in criminal investigation stage. To resolve such issues con- cerning doubtful cases, while keeping the present conditions for withdrawing a case, it is desirable to re- vise some legal regulations to expand conditions for terminating a case and empower the criminal investiga- tion agencies the power of suggestions for withdrawing a doubtful case. The right of making decision on withdrawing a doubtful case lies in the prosecution organs. In terminating doubtful cases, mutual restriction should be enhanced between the police and the prosecution, making regulations on time limit of terminating a doubtful case.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.43