检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:田君臣[1] 郭津 Tian Junchen Guo Jin(Shanghai Police College, Shanghai 200137, China)
机构地区:[1]上海公安高等专科学校,上海200137 [2]京衡律师事务所,杭州310007
出 处:《公安理论与实践(上海公安高等专科学校学报)》2017年第3期89-96,共8页Journal of Shanghai Police College
摘 要:近年来机动车套牌案件频发,套牌行为背后所涉及伪造、变造、盗窃机动车号牌的违法犯罪行为受到普遍关注。司法实践中同案不同判的情形时有发生,甚至有学者在某些案件中主张不予以刑事制裁,仅予以行政处罚。此类案件引发的法律适用上的混乱局面,不仅使民众感到迷惑,而且在司法实践和理论界也引起分歧与争论。争论的焦点集中在:套牌行为定性、机动车车牌是否属于国家机关证件、使用套牌行为是否应当纳入刑事打击范围等。In recent years cases of counterfeiting motor vehicle registration plates have been increasing in numbers. Related with counterfeiting act are violations and crimes such as fake, forgery and theft of motor vehicle plates, which capture popular attention. In judicial practice, the fact that similar cases have got different verdicts has happened from time to time. When commenting on certain cases, some scholars even claimed such criminal suspects should get administrative penalty instead of criminal punishment. Such cases have caused controversy and debates in the field of judicial practice and theory. The debate focuses on the definition of the plate-counterfeiting act, whether motor vehicle registration plates can be classified as certificates of state institutions and whether the use of counterfeited plates should be included in the list of being combated.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117