检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]宜宾市第一人民医院预防保健科,四川宜宾644000
出 处:《现代预防医学》2017年第13期2341-2343,2359,共4页Modern Preventive Medicine
摘 要:目的了解医务人员锐器伤发生特点及原因,以便为采取针对性的应对措施提供依据。方法采用自行设计的《职业性锐器伤调查问卷》收集调查对象过去12月锐器伤情况,采用SPSS20.0进行统计分析。结果 613名被调查医务人员中,锐器伤终身发生率67.20%,平均次数为3.16次/人,锐器伤年发生率32.46%。刺伤原因主要为操作时太过仓促(比例为51.76%),其次是操作不规范(比例为23.62%)。医生遭遇锐器伤的主要环节为手术缝合和传递器械过程(比例分别为60.29%和19.11%),护理人员遭遇锐器伤的主要环节为拔针和整理废物(比例分别为35.88%和35.11%)。遭遇锐器伤后立即上报的仅占39.70%,暴露源术前检查结果正常为未上报的主要原因,其次是工作太忙没时间或自身不重视。结论当前医务人员遭遇锐器伤有关问题依然突出,针对锐器伤主要发生环节和影响因素的应对措施亟待加强。Objective To explore the current situation of sharp instrument injuries among medical workers so as to provide a scientific basis for developing targeted preventive measures. Methods A self - designed questionnaire was used to conduct the retrospective survey in medical staff. SPSS 20.0 was used to analyze data. Results Of the surveyed 613 medical workers, 67. 20% workers suffered sharp instrument injuries during their work - life, and 32.46% workers were in the last 12 months. The mainly influencing factors were a sense of urgency ( rate was 51.76% ) and unstandardized operations ( rate was 23.62% ). The high - risk procedures of sharp instrument injuries were surgical suture and handover of sharp instrument among doctors ( rate were 60.29% and 19. 11% respectively), while among nurses the high- risk procedures were withdrawing needles and collecting used sharp instruments (rate were 35.88% and 35.11% respectively). Only 39.70% workers who suffered sharp instrument injuries reported their suffering. Conclusion Current situation of needle - stick injury among clinical staff is rigorous. Countermeasures regard to high - risk procedures and mainly influencing factors should be conducted timely.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117