检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈晓舒[1,2] 赵同谦[1] 李聪[3] 郑华[2]
机构地区:[1]河南理工大学,焦作454000 [2]中国科学院生态环境研究中心城市与区域生态国家重点实验室,北京100085 [3]西安交通大学经济与金融学院,西安710061
出 处:《生态学报》2017年第13期4495-4504,共10页Acta Ecologica Sinica
基 金:国家自然科学基金面上项目(71673219)
摘 要:水电开发将在局地、区域以及全球尺度上产生一系列的影响,明确这些尺度上利益相关者的成本效益、合理分配水电开发利益是减少水电开发不利影响、促进水电资源可持续利用的关键。以澜沧江干流水电能源基地建设为背景,从开发企业、移民农户、澜沧江流域政府及全球利益相关者4个利益相关者角度,选取经济、生态环境和移民生计指标对水电开发的利益再分配进行评估,结果显示:尽管水电开发总体效益大于成本,比例为4.27∶1,且水电开发所涉及的开发企业、政府流域及全球利益相关者所获得的利益大于成本,成本效益比例分别为1∶3.93、1∶3.10、1∶13.11;但移民农户成本却大于效益,比例为1.48∶1。水电开发企业等利益主体应增加生态补偿强度,才能确保移民农户的净收益不降低。该研究表明:不同利益相关者分析有助于了解成本效益分配,清晰展示利益流向,减少开发项目中的不利影响,结果可为协调水电能源开发利用与流域可持续发展提供科学依据。Hydropower is one of most widely used means of energy generation. Although it is being increasingly adopted worldwide, the impacts of hydropower development vary at local, regional, and global scales. To reduce the negative effects and promote sustainability of hydropower development, it is essential to identify the costs and benefits of these projects, and to determine a reasonable distribution of profits among stakeholders. The costs and benefits of hydropower development for different stakeholders depend on the ecosystem services available to each of them. Ecological changes produce different opportunity costs for stakeholders in terms of their livelihood and development. Thus, cost-benefit analysis is a key tool for evaluating the sustainability of a hydropower construction project. Lancang River is a well-known international river that is rich in water resources. In China, it is an important energy base for the strategic objectives of the "Bonanza" and "West-East Gas Transmission" initiatives, with the Lancang River considered to have great developmental potential. Therefore, we selected the Lancang River central stream hydropower development project for the present study. Evaluation indexes were based on the availability of data and were utilized to assess the reallocation of hydropower development benefits among four stakeholders: enterprises, migrant farmers, local government, and global beneficiaries. An index system was established to reflect and compare the costs and benefits for the different stakeholders; data were converted into Chinese yuan for ease of comparison. Spending costs by enterprises included construction investment and operating costs, whereas the benefits mainly accrued from power generation. The costs for migrant farmers comprised relocation fees and income loss; benefits included resettlement subsidies and reduced spending on electricity use. For the local government, the main cost was the lost value of ecosystem services due to flooding, and, in addition to the environmenta
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3