检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:单姣姣[1] SHAN Jiao-jiao(Southwest University of Political Science and Law, Chongqing, 401120, China)
出 处:《闽西职业技术学院学报》2017年第2期36-40,共5页Journal of Minxi Vocational and Technical College
摘 要:德国检察制度是大陆法系国家和地区的代表,其根源于法国检察制度,具有几大特征,如检察一体、检察权的双重属性、检察官强烈的客观性义务。中国的检察制度与德国不乏相似之处,例如检察权同样具有双重属性、检察系统内部实行上命下从等。中国检察制度改革可借鉴德国的经验,从检察工作一体化、明确检察权的双重属性、厘清检警关系等方面进行完善。Originating from the French prosecution system, German prosecution system is the representative of the civil law system. It has several features, such as procuratorial integration, double attribute of procuratorial authority, and prosecutors' strong objectivity obligations. Chinese prosecution system has similarities with Germany, such as the double attribute of prosecution power, the implementation of subordinates obeying the higher-ups within the prosecution system, etc. Chinese prosecution system reform can learn from Germany's experience, perfecting procuratorial integration, clearing the dual attribute of procuratorial power, and clarifying the relationship between police and prosecution.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249