检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吴真[1] 李天相[1] Wu Zhen Li Tianxiang
出 处:《法学杂志》2017年第7期10-21,共12页Law Science Magazine
基 金:吉林大学校级项目"环境公益诉讼视域下环保组织利益机制研究"(项目编号:2016ZZ015)的中期研究成果
摘 要:环境法学者以后现代主义哲学思想为基础,提出了以"主客一体化""生态化"为核心的整体主义环境法学方法论,但是这一环境法学方法论显然具有忽略人的因素的生态中心主义倾向,削弱和冲淡了其对实际环境问题的应对功能。由于整体主义环境法学方法论在很大程度上是从生态学原理直接推导而来的,以其为指导的环境法学与各传统部门法学的交流出现了障碍。我们有必要反思整体主义环境法学方法论的基础和逻辑,依据可持续发展理念,融汇自然科学和人文科学的思维方法,联系事实判断和价值判断,协调与融合环境、社会和经济因素,以此为基本出发点,建立以协调与融合为核心的环境法学方法论。Environmental law scholar has brought forward a holistic research paradigm, which has the integration between subject and object or ecologicalization as its feature, based on postmodernism philosophy. But the obvious inclination of the holistic methodology is the doctrine of ecosystem interest center, which neglects the factors of human beings. This weakens and di- lutes the responding functions to practical environment issues. And because the drivation of holis- tic methodology of environmental jurisprudence is basically ecology principles, the methodology erects barriers in communication between environmental law and traditional legal branches. It is necessary to rethink the philosophy foundation and logic of holistic methodology of environmental jurisprudence, go back to the idea of sustainable development, and establish a methodology of environmental jurisprudence, which combines the mode of thinking of natural science and humanities, contacts fact judgment and value judgment and focuses on coordination and integration-the coordination and integration of the environmental, economic and social factors.
分 类 号:D922.68[政治法律—环境与资源保护法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49