检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:霍小霞[1,2]
机构地区:[1]山西大学政治与公共管理学院,山西太原030006 [2]中北大学人文社会科学学院,山西太原030051
出 处:《山西大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2017年第4期100-104,共5页Journal of Shanxi University(Philosophy and Social Science Edition)
摘 要:伴随经济的不断转轨和社会的加速转型,政府在社会治理中面临前所未有的挑战,依存于计划经济时代的管理理念和管理模式,已无法适应当前国际国内形势,社会治理创新势在必行。文章从社会治理的主导力量——政府的视角,通过"社会管理"与"社会治理"两种不同理念的对比分析,结合我国经济社会转型实际,指出目前社会治理中政府面临着治理路径依赖、社会自治主体功能异化和道德建设滞后的困境,并提出了应对的思路。With the economic transition and social transformation, government is facing unprecedented challenges in the social governance. The administration idea and pattern which depend on the planned economy era cannot adapt to the current international and domestic situation. Social governance innovation has become an imperative. This paper analyzes the difference between "social administration" and "social governance" from the perspective of government and in combination with the economic and social transformation realities of China, it points out the diffieulties that the government is facing in social governance, which include path dependence of function multiplicity of social autonomy organization and the lagging of moral construction. In the idea for solution. government, principal the end, it points out
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28