检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:常健[1] 徐倩[1] Chang Jian Xu Qian
机构地区:[1]南开大学,天津300350
出 处:《上海行政学院学报》2017年第4期4-12,共9页The Journal of Shanghai Administration Institute
基 金:国家社科基金重点项目"公共领域冲突管理体制研究"(13AGL005)
摘 要:影响医患冲突升级的主体可以分为当事方和第三方两类。当事方可以进一步分为直接当事方和间接当事方。第三方可以分为中介第三方、媒体第三方和旁观第三方。本文基于2002-2016年发生的150起医患冲突案例,分析了医患冲突升级过程中各类主体的作用频数和作用方式,并发现间接当事方的作用频数超过了直接当事方,旁观第三方的作用频数超过了中介第三方和媒体第三方。医患冲突的有效治理要综合考虑各类主体的作用,特别要加强对间接当事方和旁观第三方作用方式的研究。The parties in the doctor-patient disputes can be divided into two categories: interested parties and the third parties. The interested parties can be further divided into direct and indirect interested parties. The third party can be also divided into mediators, media and onlookers. Based on 150 cases of disputes between doctors and patients during 2002-2016, this paper analyzes the frequency and mode of actions taken by various parties in the process of conflict escalation, and finds that the impact frequency of the indirect in- terested party is more than frequency of the direct interested party, that the impact frequency of the onlooker is more than the frequency of mediators and media. The effective resolution of tile conflict between doctors and patients should take into account the roles of all kinds of parties and the research on the indirect interested party and the onlooker should be strengthened.
分 类 号:D922.164[政治法律—宪法学与行政法学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222