《四库全书考证》的版本及校勘价值述略  

The Value of Textual Research and Editions of SIKUQUANSHU KAOZHENG

作　　者：琚小飞[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学清史研究所,北京100872

出　　处：《史学史研究》2017年第2期117-126,共10页Journal of Historiography

基　　金：中国人民大学2016年度拔尖创新人才培育资助计划成果

摘　　要：《四库全书考证》作为《四库全书》校勘成果的汇总,具有珍贵的文献价值,但自其成书以来,一直未受到应有的重视,以致其版本源流至今仍不明了,因此有必要仔细梳理现存各版本间的关联以及具体内容的异同。同时,由于很多书籍诸如《戒庵漫笔》等未被《四库全书》收录,但相关的考证内容见于清抄本及武英殿本《四库全书考证》,今人在整理古籍时未及引证,不仅造成其精审的校勘成果被掩盖,还致使书籍中的讹误没有得到修改。从这点来看,对《四库全书考证》版本源流的厘清,能够更加清晰地了解各版本收书的差异,有利于利用清抄本及殿本《四库全书考证》中的考证内容,为今人的校勘工作提供参考。As a compilation of emendation of SIKUQUANSHU（ Complete Library in Four Branches of Literature）, SIKUQUANSHU KAOZHENG has high value, but it has never been treated with due attention, and the issues of its edition and origin remain unclear, so it is necessary to research the relationship between its various surviving editions and find out the differences and similarities between them. Since many books, such as JIEANMANBI, haven＇ t been collected in SIKUQUANSHU, but some researches on them are found in the manuscript in the Qing Dynasty and palace edition of SIKIJQUANSHU KAOZHENG. Unfortunately, these results have been ignored by some scholars, so some errors in SIKUQUANSHU haven＇ t been modified. A study of the edition of SIKUQUANSHU KAOZHENG not only shows the differences between collected books in various editions, but also provides information for scholars to refer to.

关 键 词：《四库全书考证》 清抄本 武英殿 《戒庵漫笔》 

分 类 号：K092[历史地理—历史学]