公共项目暨政府购买服务的责任监控与绩效评估——美国《项目评估与结果法案》的洞见与启示  

Accountability and Performance Assessment of Public Programs Outsourcing:An Analysis on the Program Assessment and Results Act of USA

作　　者：尚虎平[1] 杨娟[1] SHANG Hu -ping YANG Juan(School of Politics and Public Administration, Soochow University, Suzhou 215123, China)

机构地区：[1]苏州大学政治与公共管理学院,江苏苏州215123

出　　处：《理论探讨》2017年第4期38-45,共8页Theoretical Investigation

基　　金：国家社会科学基金项目"我国县级政府潜绩评估研究"(14BGL115);"江苏省高校哲学社会科学优秀创新团队‘地方政府与社会治理’"(2015ZSTD010);"江苏省新型城镇化与社会治理协同创新中心研究项目"(2015-2018)研究成果

摘　　要：自我国出台《关于做好政府购买服务工作有关问题的通知》之后,政府向社会购买公共服务成为一项日常性工作,社会多元主体提供公共服务、参与甚至发起公共服务项目成为常态。但这种多元化参与公共服务项目的做法,却带来我国对公共项目,尤其是外包公共服务项目、购买性公共服务项目的责任监控、绩效评价问题,引发了"楼歪歪""桥脆脆""营养餐霉变"等恶果。在目前我国尚无成熟办法的情况下,被我国学术界与实践界忽视的美国《项目评估与结果法案》及其配套做法无疑可以提供一些有益的思路。综合来看,该法案以法律的形式推进全过程责任监控、外包项目不外包责任、项目绩效与项目责任以及财政预算挂钩、以项目绩效完善完整意义上的绩效型政府与责任型政府的做法对我国有着较好的借鉴作用,有助于我国更好地推动公共服务项目改革,尤其有助于促进外包公共项目的责任监控。Since Chinese government issued the Notice on Issues Related to Government Purchase of Services, government purchase of public services form society has became a daily routine. Diversified social subjects providing public service, participating and even initiating public service programs become norm state. However, the diversified participation of public service programs has brought problems of accountability and performance assessment for public programs, especially for, contracting public service programs and purchasing public service programs from which made ＂sloping building＂, ＂crisp bridge＂ and other flagrant phenomena. As there have not existed practicable, mature solutions in China presently, it＇ s wise to learn some methods and thoughts from the Program Assessment and Results Act （PARA） of America, which has been ignored by Chinese academic circle. PARA is beneficial for pushing the revolution of public service programs, particularly can facilitate the accountability of contracting public service programs.

关 键 词：公共项目 项目评估与结果法案 政府绩效 服务外包 公共责任 

分 类 号：D63-3[政治法律—政治学]