检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:肖韵[1] 周可[1] 熊梦颖[1] 杨维华[2] XIAO Yun ZHOU Ke XIONG Mengying et al(Hunan University of Traditional Chinese Medieine,Hunan,Changsha 410006, China.)
机构地区:[1]湖南中医药大学,湖南长沙410006 [2]湖南省中医药研究院附属医院,湖南长沙410006
出 处:《中国中医急症》2017年第7期1238-1240,共3页Journal of Emergency in Traditional Chinese Medicine
基 金:湖南省中医管理局基金课题(2014116)
摘 要:目的观察对比藿钩退热散治疗小儿外感发热的疗效,并探讨其机制。方法将患儿按随机数字表法分为两组,治疗组予藿钩退热散直肠滴注,对照组予藿钩退热散口服,均以3 d为1个疗程。结果两组总有效率差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。结论藿钩退热散直肠滴注法治疗小儿外感发热的疗效与口服法一致,且操作简便,解决了患儿口服中药的怕苦的难题,患儿及家属对本方法的接受度较口服法高。Objective: To observe the curative effect of Huogou Tuire Decoction on exogenous febrile disease in children,and to compare the curative effect of oral and rectal instillation. Methods: The children were randomly divided into two groups. The treatment group was treated with rectal Huogou Tuire Decoction;the control group was given oral Huogou Tuire Decoction. Results: The total effective rate of the treatment group was 100%,and the cure rate was 73.33%;the total effective rate of the control group was 100%,and the cure rate was 76.67%.There was no significant difference in the total effective rate between the two groups(P 0.05). Conclusion: Rectal Huogou Tuire Decoction has the same effect as oral,simple and convenient. It solves the fear of oral medicine,and the acceptance rate of this method is higher than that of oral method.
分 类 号:R254.9[医药卫生—中医内科学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.170