检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]华侨大学数量经济研究院
出 处:《华侨大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2017年第3期71-80,共10页Journal of Huaqiao University(Philosophy & Social Sciences)
基 金:国家社会科学基金重点资助项目(16AJL004)
摘 要:基于1995-2015年全国31个省份的面板数据,通过计算Moran’s I指数发现了各省的经济发展及技术选择存在显著的空间相关性。构建同时包含空间滞后与空间误差的空间面板模型,对我国经济增长、技术选择指数和全国人均劳动产出间的关系进行研究。研究发现:各省经济发展水平与技术选择指数在空间聚集上表现出两级分化特征,东部省份倾向于高值聚集而中部省份多为低值聚集;技术选择指数总体上对各省的经济发展具有显著的正向作用,对资本水平适中的中部省份的经济促进作用强于东部与西部地区,而西部地区的技术选择具有显著的空间溢出效应。技术选择对经济发展的不同时段的影响也有所差异。The significant spatial correlations of economic development and technique choice of provinces are found through calculating the Moran's I index using the panel data of 31 provinces of China from 1995 to 2015. The relationships between economic growth,technique choice index and the per-capita labor output are discussed through constructing the spatial panel models containing both spatial lag and spatial error. The research shows that there is the polarization characteristics of spatial aggregation in the level of economic development and technique choice index. The most of the eastern provinces locate in high-high agglomeration regions while the central provinces in low-low agglomeration regions. Generally speaking,the technique choice index has a significant positive effect on the economic development of each province. The economic promotion effects on the central provinces with moderate capital level are stronger than that of the eastern and western regions,while the technique choice in western areas has a significant spatial spillover effect. The effects of technique choice on economic growth are different in different periods.
分 类 号:F062.4[经济管理—政治经济学] F127
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145