司法公正与同理心正义  

Judicial Impartiality and Empathetic Justice

作　　者：杜宴林[1] 

机构地区：[1]吉林大学理论法学研究中心/司法文明协同创新中心,教授长春130012

出　　处：《中国社会科学》2017年第6期102-120,共19页Social Sciences in China

基　　金：国家司法文明协同创新中心;国家社科基金项目"乡土社会的变迁与基层司法创新机制研究"(批准号12BFX015);教育部人文社科重点研究基地重大项目"以人为本的法治观研究"(批准号2009JJD820003)共同资助的研究成果

摘　　要：随着社会诉求的日趋多元化,司法的公正运作遇到较为复杂的困难局面。同理心正义既能最大限度实现个案的正义裁决,又能正确对待普遍性的正义寻求,显现出一种亲社会性的公共理性,可成为这一难题的破解之道。同理心正义既是多元动态的正义,又较好地诠释了正义的对等性和互换性,也展现出了主体间性的互动特质和共鸣效果,还一定程度上荷载了较为丰富的正义德性。同理心正义尽管发端于心灵或情感体验,但完全能够经受住法律科学性的检验。同时,它也并非至善的正义,其操作机制存在一定的缺陷,也会诱发一些不利因素的产生。The increasingly diversity of society’s demands means that the impartial operation of justice is faced with a rather complex predicament.Empathetic justice can maximize the justice of verdicts in individual cases and can also handle the universality of the pursuit of justice appropriately;its demonstration of prosocial public reason offers a way out of this dilemma.Not only is empathetic justice a diverse and dynamic form of justice;it also provides a relatively satisfactory interpretation of the equivalence and convertibility of justice.As well as showing interaction and sensitive resonance of intersubjetivity,it is a vehicle for rich virtues of justice.Although empathetic justice originates in the mind or in emotional experience,it can withstand the scientific legal tests.At the same time,it remains imperfect,and certain defects in its operational mechanism may produce some adverse factors.

关 键 词：个案正义 司法公正 同理心正义 公共理性 

分 类 号：D926[政治法律—法学]