知识产权侵权赔偿数额“自由裁量”规则实证研究  

An Empirical study on the Discretionary Rule of Damages in Intellectual Property Infringement

作　　者：曹新明[1] 崔逢铭 Cao Xinming Cui Fengming

机构地区：[1]中南财经政法大学知识产权研究中心,教授401120

出　　处：《江苏社会科学》2017年第4期120-131,共12页Jiangsu Social Sciences

基　　金：2015年度教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地重大项目(15JJD820018)阶段性成果

摘　　要：知识产权侵权损害赔偿数额"自由裁量"规则不同于我国现有法定的四种损害赔偿计算方式,在司法实践中属于"缺乏合法性之客观存在",其有别于"法定赔偿"的羁束属性,具有基于证据自由裁量之特点。德国和日本有关损害数额的认定制度为我国知识产权侵权赔偿数额"自由裁量"规则的构建提供了理论支持和架构参照,通过对该种制度的比较研究,可以为我国知识产权侵权赔偿数额"自由裁量"规则找寻改革进路。The discretionary rule of damages in intellectual property infringement is different from the four legal calculating methods of damages. It is based on the discretionary feature of evidence, distinct from the restrictive feature of statutory damages. Japanese and German systems for determining damages provide theoretical support and framework reference for China＇ s discretionary rule of damages in intellectual proper- ty infringement, finding the ways of reform for the discretionary rule of damages in intellectual property in- fringement through a comparative study of these systems

关 键 词：知识产权侵权 数额酌定 举证责任 改革路径 

分 类 号：D923.4[政治法律—民商法学]