检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:韦小乐[1] 凌瑛[2] 何良妹 李燕[2] 邱玉莲[2] 姚静[2]
机构地区:[1]广西医科大学第二附属医院肿瘤内科,南宁市530007 [2]广西医科大学第一附属医院肿瘤内科一病区
出 处:《中国护理管理》2017年第7期897-901,共5页Chinese Nursing Management
基 金:2014年广西壮族自治区卫生厅自筹经费科研课题(Z2014074)
摘 要:目的 :检验中文版护理依赖量表在恶性肿瘤患者中应用的信度、效度。方法 :应用中文版护理依赖量表(Care Dependency Scale,CDS)对329例恶性肿瘤患者进行问卷调查,通过探索性因子分析提取因子,通过计算Cronbach’sα系数和重测相关系数,检验问卷的内在一致性和重测信度。结果 :中文版CDS量表经因子分析提取2个公因子,共14个条目,累积方差贡献率达69.8%;量表与ADL评分呈高度正相关(r=0.91,P<0.001),量表的内容效度指数(CVI)为0.833;Cronbach’sα系数是0.944,2个因子Cronbach’sα系数均为0.924;重测相关系数为0.667。Objective: To test the reliability and validity of the Chinese version of Care Dependency Scale (CDS) in cancer patients. Methods: Three hundred and twenty-nine cancer patients were selected by convenience sampling. The construct validity was tested using an exploratory factor analysis, the reliaility was estimated using Cronbach's α coefficient and rest-retest reliability. Results: Factor analysis identified two factors, and the cumulative variance contribution rate was 69.8%. The Chinese version of CDS and ADL were significantly correlated (r=0.91, P〈0.001). The content validity index was 0.833. The Cronbach's a coefficient (0.944) and test-retest reliability (0.667) was acceptable. Conclusion: The Chinese version of CDS has high reliability and validity, which may be used for monitoring the level of CDS in Chinese cancer patients.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117