探矿权勘查年限合理性分析——以安徽省为例  

Analysis of reasonability of age limit of prospecting right——taking Anhui Province for example

作　　者：马连新[1] 钱存超[1] 楼金伟[2] 曹亮[1] 王绍祥[3] 

机构地区：[1]安徽省公益性地质调查管理中心,安徽合肥230091 [2]安徽省国土资源厅,安徽合肥230088 [3]安徽省地质测绘技术院,安徽合肥230022

出　　处：《安徽地质》2017年第2期157-160,共4页Geology of Anhui

摘　　要：基于转采的探矿权和保留的探矿权的勘查年限可以基本等同于完整的勘查周期,本文以安徽省2013-2015年已转采和保留的探矿权作为调查分析样本,对探矿权的勘查周期进行合理性分析,认为国土资发[2009]200号文规定的勘查年限对于能源矿产较为严格、对于高风险金属矿勘查过于严格,提出了分矿种设置勘查期限的建议。Based on the fact that the age limit of a prospecting right renewed for mining right and that ot a retained prospecting right are basically identical to an intact period of exploration, this paper, with the above two forms of prospecting rights in 2013-2015 as samples for survey and analysis, made a reasonability analysis of the exploration period of a prospecting right, and argued that the age limit stipulated in the document GuoTuZiFa[2009]No.200 is strict on energy minerals, and a bit harsh on highly-risky metallic minerals, and then gave suggestions on setting different age limits on different types of minerals.

关 键 词：勘查年限 探矿权 安徽 

分 类 号：P407.1[天文地球—大气科学及气象学] F062.1[经济管理—政治经济学]