“述文化于史”:宋育仁与近代经史之学的省思  

“Express Culture in History:”Song Yuren and the Reflection on the Study of Classics and History in Modern China

作　　者：张凯[1] 

机构地区：[1]浙江大学历史学系,副教授杭州310028

出　　处：《近代史研究》2017年第4期118-130,共13页Modern Chinese History Studies

基　　金：教育部人文社科青年基金项目"经今古文之争与近代学术转型"(13YJC770065)的阶段性成果;"中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金"资助

摘　　要：近代以来,新文化派推动经学史学化、以史代经,质疑老辈学人学术。他们以方法和材料为准则判分新旧中西,无形割裂传统学术与现代学科、知识与价值之间的关联。老辈学人宋育仁则提出"述文化于史",尝试以孔门四科统摄现代学术分科,贯通义理与制度,在共和语境下重构儒学人伦与政教体系。其浓厚的复古、尊孔意识或有可商榷之处,但若以宋育仁与胡适等趋新学人的学术分合为线索,梳理近代学术流变的复杂理路,则既可丰富理解中国历史文化的路径,又能为当下反思以西律中的分科之学,谋求沟通中西、融汇新旧的新学术体系提供思想资源。In the modern time,the New Culture generation of scholars promoted the transformation of classics into history and challenged the older generation’s scholarship.They made judgments based on methods and materials of research so they unconsciously cut the connection between traditional learning and modern disciplines,between knowledge and value.Song Yuren,one scholar of the older generation,proposed to'express culture in history'and tried to use the four divisions of Confucius’s teaching to replace the modern academic disciplines,so as to link ideas and institutions,and reconstruct the Confucian value system and political-educational institution in the Republican context.Tracing the converging and separation of Song Yuren and Hu Shi’s academic routes,we can tease out the complex process of modern academic transformation,enrich our understanding of Chinese history and culture,and reflect on the Westernized disciplines of scholarship,so as to provide intellectual sources to build a new academic system that integrates the modern and the traditional,the Chinese and the Western.

关 键 词：宋育仁 整理国故 经史关系 

分 类 号：K092[历史地理—历史学]