不同频率电针治疗脑卒中后偏身感觉障碍疗效观察  

Observations on the Therapeutic Effect of Different Frequency Electroacupuncture on Poststroke Hemidysesthesia

作　　者：滕秀英[1] 王晨燃 

机构地区：[1]黑龙江中医药大学,哈尔滨市150040

出　　处：《上海针灸杂志》2017年第7期781-784,共4页Shanghai Journal of Acupuncture and Moxibustion

摘　　要：目的观察不同频率电针治疗脑卒中后偏身感觉障碍的临床疗效。方法将60例脑卒中后偏身感觉障碍患者随机分为治疗组和对照组,每组30例。两组均采用电针治疗且取穴相同,治疗组电针频率为100 Hz,对照组为1 Hz。治疗30 d后观察两组临床疗效。结果治疗组总有效率和愈显率分别为93.3%和80.0%,对照组分别为86.0%和43.3%,两组总有效率比较差异具有统计学意义(P>0.05),两组愈显率比较差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组治疗后肢体感觉障碍积分与同组治疗前比较,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.01)。治疗组治疗后肢体感觉障碍积分与对照组比较,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论电针是一种治疗脑卒中后偏身感觉障碍的有效方法,其中高频电针治疗比低频电针治疗效果更明显。Objective To investigate the clinical therapeutic effect of different frequency electroacupuncture on poststroke hemidysesthesia.Methods Sixty patients with poststroke hemidysesthesia were randomly allocated to treatment and control groups, 30 cases each. Both groups received electroacupuncture at the same points. The electroacupuncture frequency was 100 Hz in the treatment group and 1 Hz in the control group. The clinical therapeutic effects were evaluated in the two groups at 30 days after treatment.Results The total efficacy rate and the cure and marked efficacy rate were 93.3 and 80.0, respectively, in the treatment group and 86.0% and 43.3%, respectively, in the control group. There was no significant difference in the total efficacy rate between the two groups （P〈0.05）.There was a statistically significant difference in the cure and marked efficacy rate between the two groups （P＆lt;0.05）. There was a statistically significant pre-/post-treatment difference in the limb dysesthesia score in the two groups （P＆lt;0.05）. There was a statistically significant post-treatment difference in the limb dysesthesia score between the treatment and control groups （P＆lt;0.05）.Conclusions Electroacupuncture is an effective way to treat poststroke hemidyse- sthesia. High frequency electroacupuncture is more effective than low frequency electroacupuncture.

关 键 词：针刺疗法 中风后遗症 偏身感觉障碍 电针 头针 电针频率 

分 类 号：R246.6[医药卫生—针灸推拿学]