网络抗争动员研究的五种范式与反思——基于2004-2015年中国知网(CNKI)期刊数据库的文献分析  

Rethinking the Five Research Paradigms of Contentious Mobilization in Cyberspace:An Analysis Based on the Data from CNKI 2004—2015

作　　者：倪明胜[1,2] 

机构地区：[1]中共天津市委党校,天津行政学院党史党建教研部 [2]中共中央党校,政治学博士后300191

出　　处：《南京师大学报（社会科学版）》2017年第4期33-43,共11页Journal of Nanjing Normal University(Social Science Edition)

基　　金：国家社科基金青年项目"网络公共事件的演化博弈与治理机制研究"(13CZZ060)阶段性成果

摘　　要：近年来,理论界围绕网络抗争动员及其关联性议题展开论争并形成较为丰富的研究成果。通过对中国知网(CNKI)(2004—2015)期刊数据库近十余年来的文献检索和评估分析,现行网络抗争动员研究大体可概括为结构、情感、话语、工具和治理五种典型范式。从文献检视和主题分类来看,现行网络抗争动员研究在生成结构、前置条件、逻辑过程、手法策略以及抗争治理回应等方面初步形成一般性共识。但现行的网络抗争动员在理论解读和学术关照上,诸如问题视角、框架路径、范式方法等层面还存在诸多不足。网络抗争动员研究应超越范式之间的紧张对立,在互动反思、碰撞和对话中建立本土性的综合性解释框架来寻求治理之道。Mobilizations in cyberspace calling for contentious actions and issues related to this have become a hot and fruitful topic in recent years. An analysis of the CNKI （ China National Knowledge Infrastructure ） search results in the time frame from 2004 to 2015 shows that the studies on the contentious mobilizations in cyberspace can in general be divided into five paradigms： i.e. structure, emotion, discourse, instrument, and governance. A general consensus is taking shape among researchers on such issues as the generative structure, preconditions, logical process, tactics and strategy, and governance of contentious mobilizations. However, the current studies are still inadequate in such theoretical aspects including the perspective on the problems at issue, research frame, approach and paradigm. It is very advisable for the research on contentious mobilization in cyberspace to overcome the tension between different research paradigms so as to find an effective approach to the governance of such mobilizations through interactive reflections and dialogues.

关 键 词：网络抗争动员 结构范式 情感范式 话语范式 工具范式 治理范式 

分 类 号：C913.4[经济管理] D621.5[社会学]