检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:易莉[1]
机构地区:[1]西南民族大学马克思主义学院,成都610041
出 处:《重庆第二师范学院学报》2017年第4期5-9,共5页Journal of Chongqing University of Education
基 金:四川省西华大学省部级学科平台开放课题"组织公平;消极情绪与时间盗用: 基于金融行业的实证研究"( JR201505)
摘 要:对法人权利能力是否平等的不同观点,源于对权利能力的本质及其双重属性认识的差异。民事主体权利能力兼具伦理属性和法律技术属性,既承接自然法学说人格平等理念,又对抽象人格进行具体阐释;权利能力是民事权利主体扩张的结果。权利能力平等原则不仅适用于自然人,而且对法人同样适用。承认法人权利能力的平等性,是理解法人享有具体权利差异的前提。在法人法律地位平等的基础上松解法人目的限制,将为拓宽营利法人自主自治开辟新路径。The different views on equality in legal person's capacity for rights result from the different understandings of the essence of capacity for rights and its double attributes.The civil subject capacity for rights has both ethical and legal technical attributes,not only succeeds the personality equality concept of natural law,but also explains the abstract personality.The capacity for rights is the result of civil subject expanding.The principle of equality in legal person's capacity for rights applies not only to natural persons but also to legal persons.To recognize the equality in legal person's capacity for rights is the premise of understanding legal person's enjoyment of specific rights differences.In order to expand the autonomy road for profit legal persons,the legal person's purpose limitation should be relaxed based on the equal legal standing.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.112