论高度危险责任的构成——《侵权责任法》第69条的理解与适用  

On the Constitution of Strict Liability for Abnormally Dangerous Activities——Understanding and Application of Article 69 of the Law of Tort Liability

作　　者：唐超[1] 

机构地区：[1]首都医科大学法学系

出　　处：《北方法学》2017年第4期81-95,共15页Northern Legal Science

基　　金：2012年度国家社科基金一般项目"侵权责任法实施中的疑难问题研究"(12BFX083)的研究成果

摘　　要：美国《侵权法重述》第三版及《欧洲侵权法原则》援引的"非通常做法"要件,功能在于节制高度危险责任一般条款的适用,主要从活动风险和利益分布的角度来理解。《侵权责任法》第69条固应辅以说明性法条,但不必然添加此额外要件,更不必然使用中国法制陌生的术语。在高度危险责任成立因果关系的判断上,不适用相当性标准,而适用典型性标准。就高度危险责任的责任人,应限于为营业目的而从事高度危险作业之人。The functions of essentials of uncommon usage quoted by American Restatement of Tort Law（Third Edition） and Principles of European Tort Law are to restrict the general clause of strict liability forabnormally dangerous activities and they should be interpreted from the view of activity risk and interest distribution.Article 69 of Tort Liability Law should be supplemented by an explanatory provision, but it is notnecessarily add this additional element, nor is it necessary to use the unfamiliar terminology in Chinese legalsystem. As to the causation requirement, adequacy test should be replaced by typicality test. Only thosewho engaged in highly dangerous operation in their trade, business or profession should be liable for compensationin the event of any damages.

关 键 词：高度危险责任 合理注意 非通常做法 典型性标准 

分 类 号：DF521[政治法律—民商法学]