检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵桂华[1]
出 处:《中国环境管理干部学院学报》2017年第4期8-11,89,共5页Journal of Environmental Management College of China
摘 要:动物权利学说从伦理学的角度看有其重要意义,但作为内心自律的道德与作为外在强制的法律不能混为一谈,伦理学与法学二者之间不能简单地等同。从法律上主张动物权利不仅在理论上行不通,在实践中更是无法实现,纵观世界各国未有成功的先例。而动物福利在学界和世界主要国家达成了基本的共识,并形成了一套行之有效的法律和制度标准。保护动物的各项福利就是对动物的保护,是行之有效的动物保护的现实路径选择。From the perspective of ethics, the theories of animals right has its significance, but as inner self-discipline of morality and the external force, it can not be confused with the law, ethics and law can't simply equate with them. Advocating the animal rights by law not only fail in theory, but also can not be realized in practice, and throughout the world there is no successful precedent. Whereas animal welfare in the educational world and the world's major countries reached a basic consensus, and formed a set of effective system of laws and standards. Protecting the benefits of animals is to protect animals themselves, also is the realistic path choice of effective protection of animals.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28