检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:邢彪[1] 曹军海[1] 宋太亮[2] 陈守华[1] 董原生[1]
机构地区:[1]装甲兵工程学院技术保障工程系,北京100072 [2]中国国防科技信息中心,北京102205
出 处:《装甲兵工程学院学报》2017年第3期28-34,共7页Journal of Academy of Armored Force Engineering
基 金:军队科研计划项目
摘 要:针对复杂网络拓扑结构分布的不均匀性导致单一指标难以准确反映网络中节点重要程度的问题,将网络的每个节点作为1个方案,将节点重要性评价指标作为描述方案的属性,从节点度指标、介数指标、删除指标、接近中心性指标和子图指标5个方面,采用改进的逼近理想解排序法(Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution,TOPSIS)对网络节点的重要性进行综合评价,计算每个方案到理想方案的接近度,并按由大到小的顺序进行排序,得出节点重要性综合评价结果。最后,以某装备保障网络实例对该方法的可行性和有效性进行了验证。According to the problem of the inhomogeneity of the complex network topology will lead to a failure that a single index cannot accurately reflect the degree of node importance in the network,each node in the network is taken as one program,the evaluation index of node importance are taken as the program attribute in this paper. The improved method of Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to an Ideal Solution( TOPSIS) is used to evaluate the node importance from five indicators such as node degree,betweenness,deleting index,close to center and sub-graph. The approximate degree of each scheme to the ideal scheme is calculated and sorted according to the order from large to small,and the comprehensive evaluation results of node importance are obtained. Finally,the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed method are verified by an example of an equipment support network.
关 键 词:复杂网络 装备保障 节点重要性 多属性决策 逼近理想解排序法(TOPSIS)
分 类 号:E92[军事—军事装备学] TP393.02[兵器科学与技术—武器系统与运用工程]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.148.236.97