“规则导向”的理论疏解:以区域贸易协定争端解决机制为例  

Towards Explaining “Rule Orientation”:A Case of the Dispute Settlement Mechanism of Regional Trade Agreement

作　　者：孙志煜[1] 

机构地区：[1]贵州大学法学院,贵州贵阳550025

出　　处：《暨南学报（哲学社会科学版）》2017年第7期93-101,共9页Jinan Journal(Philosophy and Social Sciences)

基　　金：贵州省哲学社会科学规划一般课题<中国区域贸易争端解决的理论建构与实践应对研究>(批准号:16GZYB03);贵州大学文科重点学科及特色学科重大科研项目<民商事纠纷解决的国内法与国际法互动研究>(批准号:GDZT201601);贵州大学人文社会科学科研一般项目<区域经贸争端解决的中国模式研究>(批准号:GDYB2015003)

摘　　要："规则导向"是区域贸易争端解决领域中的重要术语,但国内外学界对该术语的解读未形成一致意见,导致其被不同程度地误读。"规则导向"是对传统争端解决理念的一种变革,依据杰克逊先生之本义以及该理论在区域贸易争端解决领域所起之作用,将其界定为一种新型的理论范式较为妥帖。在范式理念的观照下,"规则导向"将更具解释力和包容性,不仅能较好地解释区域贸易协定争端解决机制的趋同化、碎片化特征,也能涵摄区域贸易协定争端解决机制的多元化发展趋势,并在命题化的演绎进程中呈现全新的理论图景。There has not reached a consensus about 'Rule Orientation' among the scholarship,which has given rise to various mis-readings of this technical term in the field of regional trade dispute settlement.This paper suggests that it would be appropriate to define Rule Orientation as a brandnew theoretical paradigm to apply its original meaning by Mr.Jackson to the practice of regional trade dispute settlement.This paradigm entitles Rule Orientation with more interpretative powers and inclusiveness,which is expected to not also much better explain the assimilation and fragmentation of dispute settlement mechanism in RTA as better capture the trendy development of dispute settlement mechanism in RTA in a diverse way.

关 键 词：区域贸易协定 争端解决机制 规则导向 权力导向 多元化 命题化 

分 类 号：DF96[政治法律—国际法学]