一次性包皮切割缝合器与两种传统包皮环切术的应用比较  

Comparision of the effects of circumcision between using a novel disposable suture device and traditional or plastibell procedure

作　　者：黄韬[1] 吴世皓[1] 曾任创 石宇强[1] 张信基[1] 

机构地区：[1]南方医科大学附属顺德第一人民医院泌尿外科,顺德528300

出　　处：《广州医药》2017年第4期73-76,共4页Guangzhou Medical Journal

摘　　要：目的比较一次性包皮切割缝合器与传统包皮环切术和套扎环包皮环切术的临床应用效果。方法对我院2016年7月—2016年12月内门诊收治的包皮过长和包茎患者,采用不同手术方法治疗,其手术时间、术中疼痛评分(VAS评分)、术后水肿、疼痛持续时间、以及外观满意度等方面进行对比。结果在手术时间和外观满意度方面一次性包皮切割缝合器明显优于传统包皮环切术;在术中疼痛评分(VAS评分)、疼痛持续时间和术后水肿方面一次性包皮切割缝合器明显优于套扎环包皮环切术。结论一次性包皮切割缝合器与两种传统常规手术比较,手术更加简单、方便且安全,术后外观满意度高,值得临床推广。Objective To compare the effects of circumcision between using a novel disposable suture device and traditional or plastibell procedure. Methods The patients from July 2016 to December 2016 that underwent different ways of circumcision were documented. The operation time,VAS score,postoperative edema,the duration of the pain and appearance of satisfaction were collected and analyzed. Results The suture device group had shorter operation time,better appearance of satisfaction than that of traditional group（P〈0. 05）. Besides,the suture device group had lesser VAS score,shorter duration of the pain and less postoperative edema（P〈0. 05）. Conclusion Compared to traditional or plastibell procedure,a novel disposable suture device circumcision represents convenient,efficient and minimal invasive. It is worth promoting clinically.

关 键 词：包皮环切术 一次性包皮切割缝合器 包皮过长 

分 类 号：R699.8[医药卫生—泌尿科学]