检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:林秉淞[1]
机构地区:[1]复旦大学附属中山医院青浦分院放射科,上海201700
出 处:《中国CT和MRI杂志》2017年第8期118-120,127,共4页Chinese Journal of CT and MRI
摘 要:目的研究超声内镜(Endoscopic ultrasonography,EUS)与多层螺旋CT(Multi-slice spiral CT,MSCT)在胃癌术前分期中的应用价值。方法选取我院2012年9月至2014年9月拟进行手术的经活检证实为胃癌的患者79例,于手术前一周分别进行超声内镜检查与多层螺旋CT检查,与手术后病理检查结果进行比较。结果超声内镜对胃癌T分期的诊断准确率为89.87%较多层螺旋CT69.62%显著较高(P<0.05);超声内镜对T3分期的诊断准确率为90.91%较多层螺旋CT63.64%显著较高(P<0.05);多层螺旋CT对胃癌M分期的诊断准确率为79.75%较超声内镜诊断准确率65.82%显著较高(P<0.05)。结论超声内镜与多层螺旋CT检查在胃癌分期方面均有较高的准确性,超声内镜对胃癌T分期的诊断准确性较高,多层螺旋CT对胃癌M分期的诊断准确率较高,两者联合诊断对胃癌患者治疗方案的选择更有指导意义。Objective To study the application value of endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) and multi-slice spiral CT (MSCT) in preoperative staging of gastric cancer. Methods Sevenw-nine patients with gastric cancer confirmed by biopsy in our hospital between September 2012 and September 2014 were examined by EUS and MSCT, and the results were compared with the postoperative pathological findings. Results The accuracy of EUS in the diagnosis of T staging of gastric cancer (89.87%) was significantly higher than that of MSCT (P〈0.05). The accuracy of EUS in the diagnosis of T3 stage(90.91%) was higher than that of MSCT (63.64%) (P〈0.05). The accuracy of MSCT in the diagnosis of M stage of gastric cancer (79.75%) was significantly higher than that of EUS (65.82%) (P〈0.05).Conclusion The accuracy rates of both EUS and CT in the diagnosis of stage of gastric cancer are high. The accuracy of MSCT in the diagnosis gastric cancer T stage is higher while the accuracy of MSCT in the diagnosis of gastric cancer M stage is higher. The combined diagnosis of both methods is of guiding significance in choosing treatment regimen of gastric cancer,
分 类 号:R445.1[医药卫生—影像医学与核医学] R735.2[医药卫生—诊断学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.166