检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:刘树国[1] LIU Shuguo
机构地区:[1]四川民族学院政法系
出 处:《四川民族学院学报》2017年第3期52-56,共5页Journal of Sichuan Minzu College
基 金:四川省教育厅人文社会科学一般项目--"藏区刑事和解制度研究--以甘孜藏区为例";项目编号:14SB0268
摘 要:兴功惧暴和定分止争分别体现了法的阶级统治作用和执行公共事务的作用。刑事司法中,传统的刑事司法模式侧重于兴功惧暴,现代的刑事和解模式侧重于定分止争。在解决刑事纠纷时,应当处理好兴功惧暴与定分止争的关系,甘孜藏区的合作模式将法律、政策、习惯等因素有效地结合,更能充分发挥法的定分止争的作用,有利于实现兴功惧暴与定分止争的契合。Intimidating violence by punishments and ending disputes by identifying responsibilities dem- onstrate the roles of a law played in classes governing and executing public affairs respectively. In criminal judicature, the traditional mode emphasizes on intimidating the violence by strong punishments, while the modern focuses on ending disputes by identifying responsibilities. When solving criminal disputes, the traditional and modern ones must be well - balanced. In Ganzi Tibetan Autonomous Prefecture, the cooperative mode that effectively combines law, policy, custom and other factors will allow the law a full play in ending disputes and benefit the coordination between intimidating violence by punishments and ending disputes by identifying responsibilities.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.43