检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:赵斌[1,2]
机构地区:[1]西安交通大学国际问题研究中心 [2]英国爱丁堡大学
出 处:《欧洲研究》2017年第3期20-40,共21页Chinese Journal of European Studies
基 金:作者主持的国家社会科学基金青年项目"新兴大国气候政治合作与中国气候外交研究"(批准号:15CGJ009)的阶段性成果
摘 要:新型国际关系理念的核心在于合作共赢。既有研究尤其是国外学界对新型国际关系理念的解读尚有不足之处,甚或催生错误认知。本文以"利益共容"为理论视角,对19世纪末至20世纪上半叶英美和英德关系的经典历史案例比较后发现,即使在战争频仍的帝国主义时代,仍存在"利益共容"的可能。美国拓展"相容利益"实现英美权力和平转移,德国偏向"狭隘利益"与国际社会福祉相疏离的历史,具有深刻的启迪意义。新型国际关系建构,应寻找"利益共容",国家间政治互动更应以史为鉴,尽可能实现合作共赢。The core idea of a New Type of International Relations rests on win-win cooperation.However,it seems that there are a number of deficiencies in the interpretation towards this idea in the existing studies,especially those of the overseas scholars.Taking'encompassing interests'as a theoretical perspective,this paper makes a comparison between the UK-US and the UK-Germany relations in the late 19th Century to early 20th Century.It can be found that it is possible to achieve'encompassing interests'even in the imperialism era with frequent warfare.The experience of the US expansion of'inclusive interests'to fulfill peaceful power transition between the UK and US and the history of Germany deviating into'narrow interests'while alienating itself from the wellbeing of international society have brought us profound historical insights.It is necessary for nation states to seek for'encompassing interests'in order to construct a New Type of International Relations and realize win-win cooperation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222