中美专利新颖性判断标准比较  

Patent Novelty Judgment Standard Comparison Between China and America

作　　者：司艳雷[1] 黄亚男[1] 

机构地区：[1]国家知识产权局专利局专利审查协作天津中心

出　　处：《中国发明与专利》2017年第7期85-89,共5页China Invention & Patent

摘　　要：专利的新颖性判断是专利审查和司法诉讼中的重要问题之一,各国由于国情不同在立法、专利审查和司法实践中对新颖性判断存在一定的差异。本文通过梳理中美专利新颖性的立法沿革,从新颖性判断时间标准、空间标准、宽限期、抵触申请主体、判断原则等角度对比研究了中美两国对新颖性判断的异同,最后,对政府知识产权部门以及要进入美国的创新主体给出了相应的建议。Patent novelty judgment is an important problem in patent examination and judicial litigation. Because of different national conditions, there are some differences about patent novelty judgment of various countries in legislation, patent examination and judicial practice. Through teasing patent novelty legislation evolution of China and America, the similarities and differences of novelty judgment of China and America are comparatively studied in time standard, space standard, grace period and conflicting application subject and judgment. Suggestions are provided to the government intellectual department and innovative subjects who want to enter into America.

关 键 词：专利 新颖性 判断 

分 类 号：TB939[一般工业技术—计量学]