检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:田波[1] 胡建新[1] 胡瑞钺[1] 李志优[1] TIAN Bo HU Jianxin HU Ruiyue LI Zhiyou(Dept. of Pharmacy, Jiangxi Provincial People's Hospital, Nanchang 330006, Chin)
出 处:《中国药房》2017年第21期2881-2884,共4页China Pharmacy
基 金:江西省卫生计生委科技计划项目(No.20151013)
摘 要:目的:为我国各省增补基本药物进行可定量的综合评价,为新版基本药物目录的遴选提供参考。方法:以德尔菲法为基础建立评价指标,并采用层次分析法,通过两两比较,构建判断矩阵,计算出各指标权重系数并进行一致性检验。结果:构建了由6个一级指标(包括有效性、安全性、稳定性、可供应性、可负担性、适应性)和24个二级指标构成的评价模型,并求解出各指标对目标层的权重,其中有效性和安全性的权重值居前两位。结论:层次分析法能较科学、合理地确定权重系数,提高评价指标体系的可信度和可操作性,是探索省增补基本药物科学遴选体系的有益尝试。OBJECTIVE: To provide reference for the selection of new edition of Essential Medicine List by quantitative comprehensive evaluation for additional essential medicine. METHODS: The evaluation factors were established according to Delphi method, and Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) was conducted to compare the factors in pairs, construct the judgment matrix, calculate the weight coefficients of every factor and do the consistency test. RESULTS: The evaluation model was composed of 6 first-class indexes (including effectiveness, safety, stability, availability, affordability and adaptability) and 24 second-class indexes, and the weight of each index to the target layer was calculated. Among them, the weight of validity and security is the top two. CONCLUSIONS:The weight coefficient can be determined scientifically and reasonably by AHP, and the reliability and operability of the evaluation index system can be improved. It is a useful attempt to explore the selection system of additional essential medicine.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.148.241.210