高原军人抑郁、焦虑与情绪调节方式的关系  

Relationship of emotion regulation types with depression and anxiety in military personnel in high altitude

作　　者：王菲菲[1] 徐文佳[1] 谢守蓉 李丽 李晋 赖薇[1] 郑飞宇 王立菲[1] 刘云波[1] 蒋娟[1] 王佳[1] 徐媛媛[1] 杨国愉[1] 

机构地区：[1]第三军医大学心理学院军人发展与教育心理学教研室 [2]解放军第22医院护理部 [3]解放军62201部队政治部

出　　处：《第三军医大学学报》2017年第15期1537-1542,共6页Journal of Third Military Medical University

基　　金：国家自然科学基金面上项目(31640036);国家社会科学基金(14GJ-003123;15XSH017);军队心理卫生科研重点课题(12XLZ103)~~

摘　　要：目的探讨高原军人抑郁、焦虑与情绪调节方式的关系。方法采用流调中心抑郁自评量表(center for epidemiologic studies depression scale,CES-D)、状态-特质焦虑量表(state-trait anxiety inventory,STAI)、军人情绪调节方式量表(armymen emotion regulation types questionnaire,AERTQ)对4691名高原军人进行抽样调查。结果 (1)高原军人抑郁发生率为31.60%,均分为(13.27±7.19);状态焦虑均分(39.28±8.98),特质焦虑均分(39.28±8.43)。(2)4种军人情绪调节方式使用频率差异有统计学意义[F(3,13 890)=1401.99,P<0.01],从高到低依次是自我安慰(15.60±4.29)、情感求助(13.82±4.22)、行为抑制(13.45±4.32)、认知重视(11.16±3.98)。(3)高原军人的抑郁、状态焦虑、特质焦虑都与认知重视(r=0.492、r=0.303、r=0.373,P<0.01)、行为抑制(r=0.189、r=0.041、r=0.057,P<0.01)呈正相关,而与情感求助(r=-0.099、r=-0.185、r=-0.161,P<0.01)、自我安慰(r=-0.150、r=-0.221、r=-0.227,P<0.01)呈负相关。(3)认知重视、行为抑制、情感求助、自我安慰能够有效地预测高原军人抑郁情绪,总解释率为29.40%;认知重视、情感求助、自我安慰能够预测高原军人状态焦虑和特质焦虑,总解释率分别为17.00%、22.10%。结论使用不同军人情绪调节方式对高原军人抑郁、状态焦虑和特质焦虑有重要影响。Objective To explore the relationship of emotion regulation types with depression and anxiety in officers and soldiers stationed in high altitude areas. Methods A total of 4 691 officers and soldiers stationed in plateau areas were surveyed with epidemiologic studies depression scale （CES-D）, statetrait anxiety inventory （STAI） and armymen emotion regulation types questionnaire （AERTQ）. Results ① In high altitude areas, the prevalence rate of depression in military personnel was 31.60%. The mean score for depression symptom was 13.27±7.19, that for state anxiety inventory was 39.28±8.98, and for trait anxiety inventory was 39.28±8.43. ②The frequencies of using 4 emotion regulation types were significant different [F（3,13890）=1401.99, P〈0.01], with self-comfort （15.60±4.29）, affective-appeal （13.82±4.22）, behavior-restrain （13.45±4.32）, and cognitive-focus （11.16±3.98） in order. ③The depression, state anxiety and trait anxiety had positive correlation with cognitive-focus （r=0.492, r=0.303, r=0.373, P〈0.01） and behavior-restrain （r=0.189, r=0.041, r=0.057, P〈0.01）, and had negative correlation with affective-appeal （r=-0.099, r=-0.185, r=-0.161, P〈0.01） and self-comfort （r=-0.150, r=-0.221, r=-0.227, P〈0.01）. ④ Cognitivefocus, behavior-estrain, affective-appeal and selfcomfort were predictors of depression, with a total explanation rate of 29.40% for the total variance. Cognitivefocus, affective-appeal and self-comfort were predictors of state anxiety and trait anxiety, which could explain 17.00% and 22.10% respectively of the total variance. Conclusion Different emotion regulation types exert important effect on depression, state anxiety and trait anxiety in officers and soldiers in high altitude.

关 键 词：高原军人 抑郁 状态焦虑 特质焦虑 情绪调节方式 

分 类 号：R339.54[医药卫生—人体生理学]