骨折复位外固定器治疗下肢复杂性骨折的效果分析  

Effect of fracture reduction with external fixator in the treatment of patients with complex fracture of lower limb

作　　者：穆杰[1] 

机构地区：[1]河南科技大学第二附属医院,河南洛阳471000

出　　处：《临床研究》2017年第5期45-46,共2页Clinical Research

摘　　要：目的 分析骨折复位外固定器治疗下肢复杂性骨折的临床效果.方法 选择2015年4月至2016年4月我院收治的102例下肢复杂性骨折患者作为研究对象,根据治疗方法分为对照组和观察组,每组51例.对照组患者采用常规固定治疗,观察组患者使用外固定器治疗,比较两组患者的治疗效果.结果 治疗后,观察组的治疗总有效率为98.04%,高于对照组的80.39%（P〈0.05）;观察组的并发症发生率为1.96%,低于对照组的15.69%（P〈0.05）.观察组的VAS疼痛评分、愈合时间及患者满意度均优于对照组（P〈0.05）.结论 使用常规固定以及骨折复位外固定器治疗下肢复杂性骨折均可取得一定治疗效果,但骨折复位外固定器治疗效果更好,并发症发生率低.Objective To investigate the effect of fracture reduction with external fixator in the treatment of patients with complex fracture of lower limb. Methods From April 2015 to April 2016, 102 cases of patients with complex fracture of lower limb were selected and divided into control group and observation group according to the treatment method, with 51 patients in each group. The patients in the control group were treated with conventional fixation, while the patients in the observation group were treated with fracture reduction and external fixator, the treatment effect were compared between the two groups. Results After treatment, the total effective rate of the observation group was 98.04%, which was higher than 80.39% of the control group （P〈0.05）. The incidence of complications was 1.96% in the observabion group, which was lower than 15.69% of the control group （P〈0.05）. The VAS score, healing time and satisfaction of the observation were better than those of the con- trol group （P〈0.05）. Conclusion Both of conventional fixation and fracture reduction with external fixation have good effect for complex fracture of lower limb, but fracture reduction with external fixation has better efficacy and less complications.

关 键 词：骨折复位 外固定器 下肢复杂性骨折 

分 类 号：R687.3[医药卫生—骨科学]