检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]平顶山市第一人民医院心血管心内三科,河南平顶山467000 [2]平顶山市第一人民医院CCU,河南平顶山467000
出 处:《临床研究》2017年第6期135-136,共2页Clinical Research
摘 要:目的 探讨责任制整体护理干预对老年动脉粥样硬化(AS)患者的影响.方法 选取2014年11月至2016年6月平顶山市第一人民医院收治的72例AS患者,依据建档编号的奇偶分为两组,各36例.对照组给予常规护理干预,研究组在常规护理基础上给予责任制整体护理干预.统计比较护理前、后两组患者的生活质量评分变化情况及护理满意度.结果 护理前,两组患者生活质量评分比较,无明显差异(P>0.05),护理后,研究组患者的生活质量评分高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);研究组患者的护理满意度为94.44%,高于对照组的75.00%(P<0.05).结论 对老年AS患者采用责任制整体护理干预效果显著,可有效改善其生活质量,提高护理满意度.Objective To investigate the influence of holistic nursing intervention of responsibility system in elderly pa- tients with atherosclerosis (AS). Methods Clinical data of 72 AS patients admitted in the First People's Hospital of Pingding- shah between November 2014 and June 2016 were recruited and divided into control group (n=36) and study group (n=36) according to the document order. Patients in the control group received conventional nursing intervention, while patients in the study group received bolistic nursing intervention of responsibility system based on the control group. Life quality score and nursing satisfaction before and after nursing in the two groups were counted and compared. Results The scores of life quality in the two groups before the nursing showed no significant difference (P〉0.05); the life quality scores in the study group after nursing were higher than those in the control group, and showed a statistically significant difference (P〈0.05); nursing satisfaction in the study group (94.44%) was higher than that in the control group (75.00%), and showed a statistical- ly significant difference (P〈0.05). Conclusion The application of holistic nursing intervention of responsibility system for el- derly AS patients can effectively improve their living quality and nursing satisfaction.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38