住区再生为主导的历史街区保护模式研究——以杭州小河直街历史街区与小营巷历史街区为例  

Protected Mode of the Historical Districts Lead by the Residential Regeneration: Taking Xiaohe Zhijie Historical District and Xiaoyingxiang Historical District in Hangzhou as Examples

作　　者：邓媛祺 吴云[1] 方炜淼[2] 

机构地区：[1]浙江农林大学风景园林与建筑学院 [2]浙江大学建筑设计研究院

出　　处：《华中建筑》2017年第7期53-59,共7页Huazhong Architecture

基　　金：浙江省大学生科技创新活动计划暨新苗人才计划"杭州市以社区营造为主导的历史街区保护模式研究及推广"(编号:2016R412041)

摘　　要：中国的历史街区,近年来正从以旅游、商业开发为主导的保护模式逐步向以住区再生为主导的保护模式过渡。这种以住区再生为主导的新兴保护模式秉持生活真实性原则,确保原住民回迁率、确保原生活方式保存度。该文阐述了模式的形成原因和保护目标,同时结合杭州的小河直街街区与小营巷街区的保护实践,探讨针对不同特征的历史街区,实际操作时在功能定位、基础设施配套、建筑物改造、环境与景观整治等方面具体方式的相同与差异。进而总结我国以该模式开展保护工作的优点与不足,以期为今后历史街区的保护提供参考。The protected mode of Chinese historical districts has changed step by step from the mode which led by the tourism or trade to the one led by residential regeneration. This kind of protected mode uphold the principle of reality, ensure the rate of aboriginals＇ moving back, guarantee the preserving degree of original life style. In this paper we proposed the forming reasons and conservation objectives. Simultaneously we discussed the similarities and differences in concrete ways of function orientation, supporting infrastructure, building renovation, landscape remediation through investigating the examples of Xiaohe Zhijie and Xiaoyingxiang historical and cultural district in Hangzhou. Finally we summarized the advantages and disadvantages of this mode which used into the practice, we hope to provide reference for the protection of historical and cultural districts in China.

关 键 词：历史街区 住区再生 异同研究 

分 类 号：TU984[建筑科学—城市规划与设计]