检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:李大品[1] 张翼[1] 郭莹[1] 欧柏青[1] 宁忠平[1] 郑昭芬[1] 潘宏伟[1] 何晋[1]
机构地区:[1]湖南师范大学第一附属医院,湖南长沙410005
出 处:《湖南师范大学学报(医学版)》2010年第1期26-28,共3页Journal of Hunan Normal University(Medical Sciences)
摘 要:目的:探讨右心室主动电极起搏与被动电极起搏二者之间起搏参数的差异。方法:永久心脏起搏器患者186例,其中93例为右室间隔部主动电极起搏,93例为右室心尖部被动电极起搏,于植入时测试单极起搏阈值、感知及阻抗,所有患者的起搏脉宽均为0.42ms。结果:有效起搏时主动电极组与被动电极组比较起搏阈值无显著差异(1.19±0.25 vs 0.98±0.25)V(P>0.05),被动电极组感知显著高于主动电极组感知(8.57±5.08 vs 7.69±4.21)mV(P<0.05),被动电极组阻抗显著高于主动电极组阻抗(718.60±239.50 vs 656.88±165.47)Ω(P<0.05)。结论:被动电极即刻感知优于主动电极,阻抗则高于主动电极。Objective To investigate the difference between the use of the active lead lines and the passive lead lines.Methods 186 cases of pacemaker patients were divided into 2 groups,93 cases of pacemaker patients were implanted the active lead lines,93 cases of pacemaker patients were implanted the passive lead lines,and test the pacing threshold,sensing and impedance,The pacing pulse width are 0.42ms.Results The pacing threshold between the two groups had no significant difference(1.19±0.25 vs 0.98±0.25)V(P>0.05),the pacing sensing in the passive leads were higher(8.57±5.08 vs 7.69±4.21)mV(P<0.05).the pacing impedance in the passive leads group were also higher than the active leads group(718.6 ± 239.5 vs 656.9 ± 165.5) Ω(P<0.05).Conclusion The pacing sensing of the passive leads was better than the active leads.
分 类 号:R541.7[医药卫生—心血管疾病]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.28