检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张野[1] 林映花[1] 廖雨风[1] 易礼平[1] 徐晓妮[1] 皮丹[1]
机构地区:[1]广东省深圳市南山区人民医院呼吸内科,深圳市518052
出 处:《护理实践与研究》2017年第13期15-18,共4页Nursing Practice and Research
摘 要:目的:探讨品管圈对降低非人工气道患者声门下吸痰插管失败率的作用。方法:成立品管圈活动小组,选定主题,制定目标与计划,分析原因后提出针对性措施,包括相关知识和操作培训,制定声门下吸痰操作指引,完善健康教育等,观察比较实施品管圈活动前后声门下吸痰失败率。结果:实施品管圈活动后,声门下吸痰失败率由活动前的42.86%降低至活动后的16.83%,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:开展品管圈活动可降低非人工气道患者声门下吸痰插管失败率,有利于提高圈员的综合能力。Objective:To discuss the effect of quality control circle (QCC) in reducing the failure rate of incubation of subglottic sputum suction for non-artificial airway patients.Methods:A QCC activity team was established, topic was selected, objective and plan were established and countermeasures were proposed after analyzing the reasons, including relevant knowledge and operation training, subglottic sputum suction operation guideline was established, health education was perfected, and the failure rate of subglottic sputum suction before and after implementation of QCC activities was observed and compared.Results:After implementing the QCC activities, the failure rate of subglottic sputum suction reduced from 42.86% before the activities to 16.83% after the activities, and the difference was statistically significant (P〈0.05).Conclusion:Carrying out QCC activities could reduce the failure rate of incubation of subglottic sputum suction for non-artificial airway patients and could improve the comprehensive ability of persons within the QCC.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117