检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张侃[1] 陈华林 陈怡绮[1] 郑吉建 张马忠[1]
机构地区:[1]上海交通大学医学院附属上海儿童医学中心麻醉科,200127
出 处:《国际麻醉学与复苏杂志》2017年第7期583-586,共4页International Journal of Anesthesiology and Resuscitation
基 金:中国医师协会麻醉学医师分会青年医师科研基金(220160900008)
摘 要:目的 评价基于非先天性心脏病患儿(children without congenital heart disease, NCHD)气管环状软骨平面横径值(transverse diameter of cricoid cartilage, CD)与年龄或体型所建立的直线回归方程,比较回归方程预测先天性心脏病患儿(children with congenital heart disease, CHD)环状软骨平面的气管横径值(cricoid diameter predicted by formula, CDformula)和超声实测值(cricoid diameter measured by ultrasound, CDultra)的一致性。 方法 纳入64名NCHD,镇静后测量CDultra,记录患儿年龄、身高、体重、BMI、体表面积等数据,采用逐步向前法与CD建立线性回归模型。纳入CHD 30例和NCHD 25例,比较两组患儿CD超声测量值与线性回归模型预测值的一致性。 结果 NCHD的CD值与年龄呈正相关(r=0.90,P〈0.05),回归方程为CD(cm)=0.048×年龄(岁)+0.525。两组人群CDformula和CDultra之间存在相关性(P〈0.05),NCHD组患儿CDformula和CDultra的相关性为0.94,而CHD组患儿CDformula和CDultra的相关性为0.71。NCHD组和CHD组CDultra和CDformula的偏移值分别为-0.00 cm、-0.01 cm,95%一致性界限分别为(-0.06 cm,0.05 cm)和(-0.17 cm,0.15 cm),虽然两组患儿CDultra和CDformula的偏移相近,但是CHD组患儿的界限值宽于NCHD组患儿。 结论 在建立NCHD超声测量的CD值与年龄间线性回归方程的基础上,认为CHD模型预测和超声实测的一致性不如NCHD。因此在CHD气管插管时,测量CDultra可能会使气管导管的选择更加准确和便捷。Objective We evaluated the agreement of transverse diameters of cricoid cartilage(CD) of patients with congenital heart disease measured by ultrasound (CDultra) and the diameters that predicted by linear regression formula (CDformula), which was derived from pediatric patients without congenital heart disease(CHD). Methods After sedation, 64 pediatric patients without congenital heart disease (NCHD) were included to model the linear regression equation. CD measured by ultrasound, age, weight, height, body mass index and body surface area were recorded. After model established, 25 patients without CHD and 30 with CHD were included to evaluate the agreement of CD predicted by the linear regression with revised Bland-Altman analyses and CD measured by ultrasound. Results There was positive correlation between CD and age in children without CHD(r=0.90,P〈0.05). Linear regression equation was CD (cm) = 0.048×age(year)+0.525. Bias in values of CDultra and CDformula were -0.00 cm and -0.01 cm. 95% limits of agreement was -0.06 cm to 0.05 cm and -0.17 cm to 0.15 cm individually. CDformula was correlated to CDultra in NCHD and CHD groups(0.94 and 0.71,P〈0.05). Conclusions In our study, we show empirical formula from children without congenital heart disease cannot predict CD of children with CHD accurately. Thus, tracheal tube in pediatric patients guided by ultrasonography may be much more accurate and convenient.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.23