氧驱动雾化吸入与空气压缩泵雾化吸入治疗小儿哮喘疗效及优缺点分析  

Analysis of curative effect and advantages and disadvantages by oxygen atomizing aerosol inhalation and air compressor pump aerosol inhalation in the treatment of pediatric asthma

作　　者：杜长波 裴玉梅 

机构地区：[1]潍坊市坊子区人民医院儿一科,261206 [2]潍坊市坊子区人民医院药房

出　　处：《中国实用医药》2017年第19期7-9,共3页China Practical Medicine

摘　　要：目的对比分析氧驱动雾化吸入与空气压缩泵雾化吸入治疗小儿哮喘的临床疗效和优缺点。方法 90例小儿哮喘疾病患儿纳入本次研究,依据入院号的单双号分对照组(空气压缩泵雾化吸入治疗)和研究组(氧驱动雾化吸入治疗),各45例,对比两组患儿临床治疗状况。结果研究组治疗总疗效率为91.11%,高于对照组的75.56%,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。两组患儿治疗前血氧饱和度(Sa O2)指数对比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05);研究组治疗后Sa O2指数变化优于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。研究组患儿咳嗽胸闷消失时间、反复喘息消失时间、呼吸困难恢复正常时间、住院时间均短于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。治疗前两组患儿最大呼气流量对比差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),治疗后,研究组最大呼气流量明显高于对照组,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论临床治疗小儿哮喘疾病时可给予氧驱动雾化吸入或空气压缩泵雾化吸入方式,但氧驱动雾化治疗的疗效更为理想,且更为安全可靠,临床应用性和推广性较大。Objective To compare and analyze clinical effect and advantages and disadvantages by oxygen atomizing aerosol inhalation and air compressor pump aerosol inhalation in the treatment of pediatric asthma. Methods A total of 90 pediatric asthma patients in this research were divided by admission order into control group（air compressor pump aerosol inhalation for treatment）and research group（oxygen atomizing aerosol inhalation for treatment）, with 45 cases in each group. Comparison was made on clinical treatment condition between the two groups. Results The research group had higher total effective rate in treatment as 91.11% than 75.56% in the control group, and their difference had statistical significance（P〈0.05）. There was no statistically significant difference of oxyhemoglobin saturation（Sa O2） index before treatment between the two groups（P〈0.05）. The research group had better changes of Sa O2 after treatment than the control group, and their difference had statistical significance（P〈0.05）. The research group had all shorter cough and chest distress disappearance time, recurrent wheezing disappearance time, dyspnea recovery time, and hospital stay time than the control group, and their difference had statistical significance（P〈0.05）. There was no statistically significant difference of peak expiratory flow before treatment between the two groups（P〈0.05）. After treatment, the research group had obviously higher peak expiratory flow than the control group, and their difference had statistical significance（P〈0.05）. Conclusion Oxygen atomizing aerosol inhalation and air compressor pump aerosol inhalation are feasible in clinical treatment of pediatric asthma, and oxygen atomizing aerosol inhalation provides more ideal effect, and high safety and creditability. This method contains high clinical applicability and generalization performance.

关 键 词：小儿哮喘 空气压缩泵雾化吸入 氧驱动雾化吸入 疗效 

分 类 号：R725.6[医药卫生—儿科]