检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吴桐[1]
出 处:《贵州警官职业学院学报》2017年第4期62-69,共8页Journal of Guizhou Police Officer Vocational College
基 金:西南政法大学研究生科研创新项目
摘 要:信息化侦查理论的提出由来已久,而相应的法律规制却越发趋向于应景式研究。究其实质,源于对相关侦查行为手段的实质性界定紊乱,使法律规制置于理论架构模式之上而缺乏现实考量。信息化侦查的侵权层级划分应从行为性质上判断,即通过任意侦查理论中主观侦查相对方意志、客观侵犯权益性质及行为必要性三方面结合具体实践情况对相应的侦查手段性质进行判断,从而对信息化侦查做出不同程度的法律规制。The investigation information theoryhas been proposed for a long time, relevant investigations are rather few. The essence lies in the fact that the substantive definition of the relevant investigative means is disordered, and the legal regulation is placed on the theoretical framework and lacks practical consideration.The level of infringement in information investigation should be judged by the nature of behavior, that is to say the judge should be based on the combining of the will of the waiver, the nature of objective rights violation and the necessity of behaviorin accordance with the specific practice to judge the nature of the corresponding investigative means, so as to make different levels of legal regulation of information investigation.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.33